Why I write an academic history blog
By Christopher Knowles | 18 January 2011 | Category: Featured - Why blog?, Why blog? | 3 commentsFor the past 5 years I have written an academic history blog, How it really was, recording some of my ideas and, I hope, discoveries, as I work my way through my research:
I started the blog as a way to make myself write something about my research. At first, I didn’t know if anyone would read the blog and I didn’t care. Even if no-one else ever looked at it, I thought it would be useful as a way of helping me get my thoughts in order.
Over the past 5 years I have written 118 posts; an average of just under one a fortnight, so not quite the rate of one post a week, that I originally aimed for.I now receive an average of 48 hits (page views) a day. Some of these are probably automatic enquiries from search engines and some people will look at more than one page in a session, so I don’t know how this number translates into real people viewing the blog. I guess an average of around 10 people look at it every day.
Most people come to the blog via searches on Google. Amazingly, if you type “British occupation of Germany” (the subject of my research) into Google, a page from my blog comes up as no.3 on the list, after two pages from Wikipedia. If you type “Operation Unthinkable” (the subject of one post) my blog also comes up third on the list, after Wikipedia and the Daily Mail!
Over the years, I‘ve had 37 comments from readers (excluding spam). Some referred to personal stories about themselves or their families. Some were from academics commenting on aspects of my research. One was from someone in Russia who said he was surprised to learn that something he had assumed was a Cold War myth perpetuated by the Communist Party (that the British had drawn up plans to invade Russia after the end of the war) turned out to be true after all.
I’ve lost count of the emails I’ve received; probably an average of one every week or two. These have come from, among others, a prize-winning children’s novelist who wanted to check the historical detail for her next book, students working on their long essays or dissertations, people researching their family histories and a lady born in Germany, now living in England, who told me about how she and her family stole coal from railway wagons after the war and who now runs her own blog.
As an academic historian, writing the blog raises some issues, which I hope this new project will address:
- Does writing a blog conflict with our research? Is it right for a PhD student to engage in this way with a non-academic audience?
- Should academic bloggers have more respect for the academic principle of proper peer review? No one has checked what I write for accuracy. Anyone can start a blog and write any old rubbish, if they want. Could academic blogs be open to abuse?
- In my posts I sometimes quote from books I have read and the archives I have researched. As my blog is entirely non-commercial and conducted for educational purposes, am I right to claim that this is permitted by the “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright act?
- Should I engage more actively with other people writing history blogs, for example by commenting on their blogs, and so try to create more of a community? Is so, what is the best way of doing this?




Thanks for this interesting article.
I think your question of a blog conflicting with our research is an important one, and writing a blog could potentially cause problems down the line (in terms of career).
Writing an academic blog makes your rough thoughts public – they can be seen by future employers / publishers / stalkers. It’s possible that as academic blogging takes off (and I’m sure it will), this will become less important, and some future employers might see a blog as evidence of constant thinking and revision.
At the same time, we’re conducting supposedly original research, and there could be some real legal issues to contend with.
Hello, Mr. Knowles.
Although I’m not a postgraduate I am hoping you might enjoy my comments. I too have a history blog (www.soapysmiths.blogspot.com). I use the blog format as a continuation of my book, Alias Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel. I find that many history books become outdated over the years as new information is uncovered. I find that my blog helps keep my book’s content fresh and alive. I have a regular website on Soapy Smith (www.soapysmith.net) but find that the blog helps me obtain new information, much of it from non postgraduates. Research is research so I’m not sure of the advantages of being a postgraduate as far as information goes, but I have witnessed first hand how one postgrad obtained a position in an Alaskan university using my research.
Jeff Smith
Mark, yes I agree it’s a serious issue. Suppose I publish some (original) thoughts on my blog. Another postgraduate student then (quite legitimately) reads these and and uses the same ideas in their own work (possibly even citing the blog) and, because I am a part time student, they submit their thesis before I submit mine.
Could I still include the same ideas, originally published in my blog, in my own thesis, as ‘original work’, even though they have, by now, appeared in someone else’s thesis? I would argue that I could, as I could prove I had the idea first, as all blog postings are date and time stamped, but I have no idea what the relevant academic authorities would think of all this.
Jeff, thanks for your comment. I agree a blog can be an excellent way of keeping a book alive and up to date after it’s published.